Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services · Missouri

Heubel Material Handling, Inc.

Kansas City, MO · ~168 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heubel Material Handling, Inc. runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

Heubel Material Handling, Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 94% of Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heubel Material Handling, Inc. safety composite

Heubel Material Handling, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2017→2024

Heubel Material Handling, Inc. injury rate improved

Heubel Material Handling, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.6 from 4.0 in 2017 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.0 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=0.9 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Kansas City, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.0 · 94% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #16/61
  • PHOTO 43-St. Joseph
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~168 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 43-St. Joseph (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Heubel Material Handling, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heubel Material Handling, Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (94% of the Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heubel Material Handling, Inc. TCR series: 2017=4 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=0.9 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 2.1

Where Heubel Material Handling, Inc. falls in its industry

2,560 Industrial equipment and machi establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 61 Industrial equipment and machi employers in Missouri.

Heubel Material Handling, Inc. (168 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Heubel Material Handling, Inc.
Heubel Material Handling, Inc. (168 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Heubel Material Handling, Inc. has more employees than the Industrial equipment and machinery repai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.7 4 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2021 1.8 0.0 2 0 0
2020 1.9 0.9 2 0 0
2017 4.0 3.3 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MO · Kansas City

2,560 Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 1,023 employers in Kansas City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 43-St. Joseph 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bulk Equipment Corp. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Coast Lift Truck 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEN-TECH 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 030 - Distribution Operating - Missouri 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Overhead Door Company of St. Louis - Lackland 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willert Home Products, Inc. 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilson Manufacturing Company 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass Service Organization 11,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hallmark Cards Mass Channel 11,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Merchandising Services (GMS) 9,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Mercy - Missouri 7,709 FTE
NAT-TCR Midland Ford Lincoln, Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dixon Valve and Coupling Co. BOSS Division 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Siri and Son Farms 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR M&M Industries, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anderson Asheville, LLC 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koochiching County 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Panoramic LLC 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Forge Fabrics 168 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.