Aqueduct construction · Florida

HG Construction Development & Investment, Inc.

Miami, FL · ~38 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HG Construction Development & Investment, Inc. runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aqueduct construction workplace, earning a grade B.

HG Construction Development & Investment, Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 73% of Aqueduct construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HG Construction Development & Investment, Inc. safety composite

HG Construction Development & Investment, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

HG Construction Development & Investment, Inc.: 0.0 → 3.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.87× in 2020

HG Construction Development & Investment, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Miami, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 73% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #33/121
  • PHOTO JMB Construction Inc
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JMB Construction Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

HG Construction Development & Investment, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HG Construction Development & Investment, Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (73% of the Aqueduct construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HG Construction Development & Investment, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=3.8 · BLS 2.8

Where HG Construction Development & Investment, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Aqueduct construction establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 121 Aqueduct construction employers in Florida.

HG Construction Development & Investment, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate HG Construction Development & Investment, Inc.
HG Construction Development & Investment, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

HG Construction Development & Investment, Inc. has fewer employees than the Aqueduct construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2019 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · FL · Miami

1,614 Aqueduct construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,467 employers in Miami, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JMB Construction Inc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holt Services Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diamond Construction Company 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Max Foote Construction, LLC 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Growers Management Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smoak Groves Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alva 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSN Customer Service - North 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-MIA-MIAMI-MIA-TRML 9,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Hospital of Miami Inc. 6,876 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIACX0UPS MIA UPS 3,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Miami 2,879 FTE
NAT-TCR Valdez, AK 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AMG Demolition & Environmental Service 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tek Pak Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wyoming Office 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hillsboro 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE AVC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pueblo PB 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roses 1895 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.