Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · California

JMB Construction Inc

South San Francisco, CA · ~77 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JMB Construction Inc runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

JMB Construction Inc: 2.0 TCR = 73% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JMB Construction Inc safety composite

JMB Construction Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2017→2024

JMB Construction Inc injury rate improved

JMB Construction Inc's TCR fell 1.5 from 1.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.5 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=2.8 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · South San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #60/201
  • PHOTO Holt Services Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Holt Services Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

JMB Construction Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JMB Construction Inc averages 2.0 TCR (73% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JMB Construction Inc TCR series: 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=2.8 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where JMB Construction Inc falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 201 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in California.

JMB Construction Inc (77 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate JMB Construction Inc
JMB Construction Inc (77 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

JMB Construction Inc has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 4.4 4.4 3 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2018 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2017 1.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · CA · South San Francisco

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 136 employers in South San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Holt Services Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diamond Construction Company 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Max Foote Construction, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TML Construction, Inc. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Innovative Produce, LP 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bokisch Vineyard Management 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bassman 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE COR Chico Business Office 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Genentech SSF 13,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120951 1,497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspiranet 1,182 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02620951 1,178 FTE
NAT-TCR Benton County - Public Works 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Krome Detention Center 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Secondary 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 50033 - Capstone Kroger Indianapolis 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Benton County - Sheriff Office 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE FABco LLC Grand Prairie 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jnl Steel Components, Inc. 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ultraform Industries 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.