Tubing, copper and copper alloy, made from purchased copper or in integrated secondary smelting and rolling, drawing or extruding plants · Michigan

H&H Tube

Vanderbilt, MI · ~89 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

H&H Tube runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Tubing, copper and copper alloy, made from purchased copper or in integrated secondary smelting and rolling, drawing or extruding plants workplace, earning a grade B.

H&H Tube: 2.5 TCR = 77% of Tubing, copper and copper alloy, made from purchased copper or in integrated secondary smelting and rolling, drawing or extruding plants BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

H&H Tube safety composite

H&H Tube scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2020

H&H Tube injury rate improved

H&H Tube's TCR fell 2.6 from 3.8 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=2.0 · 2018=3.1 · 2020=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331420 · Vanderbilt, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Rea Magnet Wire Comp…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rea Magnet Wire Company, Inc. Fort Wayne Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

H&H Tube in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows H&H Tube averages 2.5 TCR (77% of the Tubing, copper and copper alloy, made from purchased copper or in integrated secondary smelting and rolling, drawing or extruding plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

H&H Tube TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=2 · 2018=3.1 · 2020=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where H&H Tube falls in its industry

198 Tubing, copper and copper allo establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Tubing, copper and copper allo employers in Michigan.

H&H Tube (89 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate H&H Tube
H&H Tube (89 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7

H&H Tube has fewer employees than the Tubing, copper and copper alloy, made fr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2018 3.1 3.1 3 0 0
2017 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2016 3.8 3.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331420 · MI · Vanderbilt

198 Tubing, copper and copper alloy, made from purchased copper or in integrated secondary smelting and rolling, drawing or extruding plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 5 employers in Vanderbilt, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rea Magnet Wire Company, Inc. Fort Wayne Plant 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ECKART America Corporation (Painesville) 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carrier Corporation (Franklin) 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Wire - Hamilton Products 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE West Branch SC 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Kalamazoo-Public Services-Harrison 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Balkema Excavating, Inc 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE 28_22 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vanderbilt North 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR H-H tube 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ell-Tron Manufacturing Co., Inc. 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR MEC Vanderbilt South 24 FTE
NAT-TCR Constant Aviation- CCM, Cuyahoga County Airport 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Faribault - Public Works Department 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bonitz Flooring and Contracting Charlotte 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Integrated Home Care 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Guaranty 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE A&AT LLC La Porte Plant 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Senior Living 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holland Mgmt - RC4 Bellaire 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.