Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Michigan

Addington Place of Lakeside Vista

Holland, MI · ~89 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
32.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Addington Place of Lakeside Vista runs at 846% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Addington Place of Lakeside Vista: 32.2 TCR = 846% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Addington Place of Lakeside Vista safety composite

Addington Place of Lakeside Vista scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 32.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 19.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−38.1

2022→2023

Addington Place of Lakeside Vista injury rate improved

Addington Place of Lakeside Vista's TCR fell 38.1 from 70.3 in 2022 to 32.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 70.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=70.3 · 2023=32.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Holland, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 32.2 · 846% of ind

  • DART 19.3 DART
  • RANK #201/201
  • PHOTO Carlton Senior Livin…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carlton Senior Living Davis (2.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Addington Place of Lakeside Vista in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Addington Place of Lakeside Vista averages 32.2 TCR (846% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Addington Place of Lakeside Vista TCR series: 2022=70.3 · 2023=32.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Addington Place of Lakeside Vista falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #201 safest of 201 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Michigan.

Addington Place of Lakeside Vista (89 employees, TCR 32.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Addington Place of Lakeside Vista
Addington Place of Lakeside Vista (89 employees, TCR 32.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Addington Place of Lakeside Vista has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 32.2 19.3 5 10 0
2022 70.3 35.1 1 21 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MI · Holland

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 299 employers in Holland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carlton Senior Living Davis 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Residence of Fosston 29.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chandler Place Independent Living 29.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alliance Mobile Health 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE 69_78 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE 254540-HOWELL PO 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weber Specialties Company 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR LG Energy Solutions - Holland 1,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haworth HQ 1,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haworth Office 1,075 FTE
CITY-NEAR PADNOS 912 FTE
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Britain EMS 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brown County Hospital 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE PACSHIP North 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Antonio 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.