Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Arizona

Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes

Prescott, AZ · ~63 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes runs at 309% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes: 11.8 TCR = 309% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes safety composite

Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes: 12.2 → 18.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 18.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2024

Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes's TCR rose 6.7 from 12.2 in 2022 to 18.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Prescott, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 309% of ind

  • DART 12.6 DART
  • RANK #81/109
  • PHOTO Arden Courts of Towson
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arden Courts of Towson (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes averages 11.8 TCR (309% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes TCR series: 2022=12.2 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=18.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 109 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes (63 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes
Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes (63 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.9 12.6 8 1 0
2023 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2022 12.2 6.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · AZ · Prescott

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 105 employers in Prescott, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Towson 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apple Valley Villa Apartments 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Osprey Village 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR WellQuest of Granite Bay 11.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE South Plant 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE MG Building Systems LLC 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sollers Central Office 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Procon Professional Concrete, LLC 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yavapai County 9,743 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yavapai County - Gov 1,746 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yavapai Regional Medical Center-West 1,083 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Prescott 552 FTE
NAT-TCR Town - Police and Animal Control 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Discovery Village at Stuart 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Queen of the Valley Hospital 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial Carpentry Resources LLC 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Louis M. Gerson Co., Inc. 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Meridian 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hotel 1620 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jeffersontown 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.