Sports Teams and Clubs · Arizona

Papago Park Giants Extended Spring Training

Phoenix, AZ · ~63 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
45.8
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Papago Park Giants Extended Spring Training runs at 1477% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sports Teams and Clubs workplace, earning a grade F.

Papago Park Giants Extended Spring Training: 45.8 TCR = 1477% of Sports Teams and Clubs BLS 3.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Papago Park Giants Extended Spring Training safety composite

Papago Park Giants Extended Spring Training scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 45.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 25.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.4

2023→2024

Papago Park Giants Extended Spring Training injury rate improved

Papago Park Giants Extended Spring Training's TCR fell 8.4 from 50.0 in 2023 to 41.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 50.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=50.0 · 2024=41.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 711211 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 45.8 · 1477% of ind

  • DART 25.6 DART
  • RANK #12/12
  • PHOTO Golf Coast League / …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Golf Coast League / Clearwater Threshers (15.9 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Papago Park Giants Extended Spring Training in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Papago Park Giants Extended Spring Training averages 45.8 TCR (1477% of the Sports Teams and Clubs BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Papago Park Giants Extended Spring Training TCR series: 2023=50 · 2024=41.6 · BLS 3.1

Where Papago Park Giants Extended Spring Training falls in its industry

157 Sports Teams and Clubs establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 12 Sports Teams and Clubs employers in Arizona.

Papago Park Giants Extended Spring Training (63 employees, TCR 45.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 206 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01020304050 Average employees Total Case Rate Papago Park Giants Extended Spring Training
Papago Park Giants Extended Spring Training (63 employees, TCR 45.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 206 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Papago Park Giants Extended Spring Training has fewer employees than the Sports Teams and Clubs median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 41.6 25.6 26 0 0
2023 50.0 30.3 33 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

711211 · AZ · Phoenix

157 Sports Teams and Clubs employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Golf Coast League / Clearwater Threshers 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Panthers Football LLC 29.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAJOR ST CAMP DUNEDIN BLUE JAYS MAJOR ST CAMP DUNEDIN BLUE JAYS 29.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trail Blazers, Inc. Practice Facility 29.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAPITOL_1356957 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Atlatl Group, LLC DBA Bravada Yachts 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highgate Senior Living at Prescott Lakes 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE T and T Industries, Inc. 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Danbury Tallmadge 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0375 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0299 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Max-Hamilton Logistics LLC 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.