Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · New York

Highlands At Pittsford

Pittsford, NY · ~150 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Highlands At Pittsford runs at 179% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Highlands At Pittsford: 6.8 TCR = 179% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Highlands At Pittsford safety composite

Highlands At Pittsford scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.4

2016→2022

Highlands At Pittsford injury rate improved

Highlands At Pittsford's TCR fell 9.4 from 16.1 in 2016 to 6.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 16.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.1 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=6.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Pittsford, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.8 · 179% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #57/98
  • PHOTO VOANS Senior Communi…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~150 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VOANS Senior Community Care of Michigan, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Highlands At Pittsford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Highlands At Pittsford averages 6.8 TCR (179% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Highlands At Pittsford TCR series: 2016=16.1 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=6.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Highlands At Pittsford falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 98 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Highlands At Pittsford (150 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Highlands At Pittsford
Highlands At Pittsford (150 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Highlands At Pittsford has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.7 3.4 6 0 0
2021 4.7 2.3 3 1 0
2020 3.3 2.2 3 0 0
2019 5.3 5.3 5 0 0
2018 6.2 5.2 6 0 0
2017 5.3 5.3 5 0 0
2016 16.1 8.6 14 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NY · Pittsford

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 25 employers in Pittsford, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VOANS Senior Community Care of Michigan, Inc. 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nugent Convalescent - Hermitage 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Management Services, LLC 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR REDBUD PLACE 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE LECESSE Construction Services LLC. 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Network Infrastructure Corporate 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danella Construction Corporation of New York 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Large Projects Northeast Region 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schottland Family YMCA 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc (Lenel) 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Pittsford 219 FTE
CITY-NEAR Highlands Living Center 190 FTE
NAT-TCR Landscape 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4598-Rtc Fontana 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 1068 Midvale 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #565 CASSELBERRY, FL 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Art Clay Co. Inc. 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Family HealthCare Network - Porterville 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tama County 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 0362 150 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.