Skilled nursing facilities · Colorado

Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community

Denver, CO · ~158 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community runs at 215% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community: 14.0 TCR = 215% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community safety composite

Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.5

2016→2018

Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community injury rate improved

Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community's TCR fell 11.5 from 22.6 in 2016 to 11.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 22.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=22.6 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=11.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Denver, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.0 · 215% of ind

  • DART 11.2 DART
  • RANK #210/259
  • PHOTO Ida Emmerson Hospice…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 57 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ida Emmerson Hospice House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community averages 14.0 TCR (215% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community TCR series: 2016=22.6 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=11.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #210 safest of 259 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Colorado.

Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community (158 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community
Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community (158 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 11.2 11.2 15 0 0
2017 8.1 8.1 11 0 0
2016 22.6 3.6 31 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CO · Denver

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ida Emmerson Hospice House 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green House Homes 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gaymont Care and Rehabilitation 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Twin Pines Health Care Center 14.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE BluSky - Centennial (Corporate) 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocky Mountain Excavating Inc. 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ouray Sportswear, LLC 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-1874 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR St. Louis Eye Surgery and Laser Center 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR R.L.Zeigler Co., Inc. 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sioux City Fire Rescue 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Guard Construction and Contracting Corporation 14.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amcor Rigid Plastics, Bellevue Facility 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horizon Hobby, LLC (4116) 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ud 0857 (Arlington - F) 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wayne Bailey Inc. 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.