623110 Nursing Care Facilities - Skilled Nursing Facilities · California

Ida Emmerson Hospice House

Eureka, CA · ~19 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ida Emmerson Hospice House runs at 215% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical 623110 Nursing Care Facilities - Skilled Nursing Facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Ida Emmerson Hospice House: 14.0 TCR = 215% of 623110 Nursing Care Facilities - Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ida Emmerson Hospice House safety composite

Ida Emmerson Hospice House scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2017→2024

Ida Emmerson Hospice House injury rate improved

Ida Emmerson Hospice House's TCR fell 1.6 from 8.8 in 2017 to 7.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 36.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.8 · 2018=36.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=30.9 · 2024=7.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Eureka, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.0 · 215% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #620/739
  • PHOTO Green House Homes
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Green House Homes (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ida Emmerson Hospice House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ida Emmerson Hospice House averages 14.0 TCR (215% of the 623110 Nursing Care Facilities - Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ida Emmerson Hospice House TCR series: 2017=8.8 · 2018=36.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=30.9 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Ida Emmerson Hospice House falls in its industry

15,252 623110 Nursing Care Facilities establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #620 safest of 739 623110 Nursing Care Facilities employers in California.

Ida Emmerson Hospice House (19 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ida Emmerson Hospice House
Ida Emmerson Hospice House (19 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Ida Emmerson Hospice House has fewer employees than the 623110 Nursing Care Facilities - Skilled median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 7.3 1 0 0
2023 30.9 7.7 4 0 0
2022 7.2 7.2 1 0 0
2021 7.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 36.2 29.0 5 0 0
2017 8.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Eureka

15,252 623110 Nursing Care Facilities - Skilled Nursing Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 96 employers in Eureka, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Green House Homes 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gaymont Care and Rehabilitation 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highline Rehabilitation & Care Community 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Twin Pines Health Care Center 14.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE A. OSEGUERA CO., INC. 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE TEIXEIRA FARMS INC 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Golden R, Inc. 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE PEDRAZZI FARMS 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 65 1,751 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA814 ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL EUREKA HR 1,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-00001430 1,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 407 701 FTE
NAT-TCR Kre-Bsl Husky Concord Operation LLC 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0515 Burlington 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Softex Products Inc PR 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Seneri Logistics, LLC 14.0 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.