Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

Highwoods Preserve Labor, LLC

Tampa, FL · ~53 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Highwoods Preserve Labor, LLC runs at 403% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Highwoods Preserve Labor, LLC: 15.3 TCR = 403% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Highwoods Preserve Labor, LLC safety composite

Highwoods Preserve Labor, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2018→2021

Highwoods Preserve Labor, LLC injury rate improved

Highwoods Preserve Labor, LLC's TCR fell 4.8 from 85.6 in 2018 to 80.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 85.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=85.6 · 2019=23.9 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=80.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Tampa, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.3 · 403% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #361/396
  • PHOTO Heritage Oaks
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage Oaks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Highwoods Preserve Labor, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Highwoods Preserve Labor, LLC averages 15.3 TCR (403% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Highwoods Preserve Labor, LLC TCR series: 2018=85.6 · 2019=23.9 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=80.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Highwoods Preserve Labor, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #361 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Highwoods Preserve Labor, LLC (53 employees, TCR 15.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Highwoods Preserve Labor, LLC
Highwoods Preserve Labor, LLC (53 employees, TCR 15.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Highwoods Preserve Labor, LLC has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 80.8 0.0 2 0 0
2020 6.7 4.5 3 0 0
2019 23.9 13.1 11 0 0
2018 85.6 14.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Tampa

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage Oaks 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Council Bluffs Countryhouse, LLC 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Terrace Court Senior Living dba Mountain Terrace Senior Living 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10545 15.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hunt Bros. Cooperative 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Insa Auburndale FL 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Topiary Creations, Inc. 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amerigo Farms Inc 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR CRI - North Michigan 15.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-6218-OUTLETS 15.3 TCR
NAT-TCR HG005 15.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 7th Street 15.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Encore Recycling, LLC 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE C048 Portland PC 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bickford of Midland 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE AVS Inc. 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.