Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing · Michigan

Hilco Technologies Plant 3

Armada Twp, MI · ~60 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hilco Technologies Plant 3 runs at 324% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Hilco Technologies Plant 3: 10.7 TCR = 324% of Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hilco Technologies Plant 3 safety composite

Hilco Technologies Plant 3 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−23.1

2017→2020

Hilco Technologies Plant 3 injury rate improved

Hilco Technologies Plant 3's TCR fell 23.1 from 25.6 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 25.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=25.6 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · Armada Twp, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.7 · 324% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #40/42
  • PHOTO ECO
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ECO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Hilco Technologies Plant 3 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hilco Technologies Plant 3 averages 10.7 TCR (324% of the Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hilco Technologies Plant 3 TCR series: 2017=25.6 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Hilco Technologies Plant 3 falls in its industry

448 Injection molding machinery fo establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 42 Injection molding machinery fo employers in Michigan.

Hilco Technologies Plant 3 (60 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hilco Technologies Plant 3
Hilco Technologies Plant 3 (60 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Hilco Technologies Plant 3 has fewer employees than the Injection molding machinery for plastics median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.9 0.0 1 1 0
2017 25.6 3.2 12 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · MI · Armada Twp

448 Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ECO 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mc Molds 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schroeder America 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alpena Johnson Street 10.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Konos DBA Vande Bunte Eggs 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marquette Board of Light & Power 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton SC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE VanDam & Krusinga Building and Restoration 60 FTE
NAT-TCR 6962-Abs 0028 4145 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR National Fuel Distribution Sharon Servicenter 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fastrucking - Lax 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Beaver Valley 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marinemax East, Inc.-Pom 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mount Prospect Academy - Residential 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garden Cut 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manufacturing 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.