Individual and family social services, multi-purpose · New Hampshire

Mount Prospect Academy - Residential

Plymouth, NH · ~60 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mount Prospect Academy - Residential runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Individual and family social services, multi-purpose workplace, earning a grade D.

Mount Prospect Academy - Residential: 5.9 TCR = 156% of Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mount Prospect Academy - Residential safety composite

Mount Prospect Academy - Residential scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2020

Mount Prospect Academy - Residential injury rate improved

Mount Prospect Academy - Residential's TCR fell 0.9 from 3.4 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=13.2 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Plymouth, NH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 156% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/40
  • PHOTO Fairbanks Resource A…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fairbanks Resource Agency (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Mount Prospect Academy - Residential in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mount Prospect Academy - Residential averages 5.9 TCR (156% of the Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mount Prospect Academy - Residential TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=13.2 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=2.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Mount Prospect Academy - Residential falls in its industry

990 Individual and family social s establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 40 Individual and family social s employers in New Hampshire.

Mount Prospect Academy - Residential (60 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mount Prospect Academy - Residential
Mount Prospect Academy - Residential (60 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Mount Prospect Academy - Residential has fewer employees than the Individual and family social services, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.6 0.0 0 1 0
2019 7.2 3.6 2 0 0
2018 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2017 13.2 0.0 4 0 0
2016 3.4 3.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · NH · Plymouth

990 Individual and family social services, multi-purpose employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 23 employers in Plymouth, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fairbanks Resource Agency 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SHIELDS for Families - Family Preservation 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jasper County 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Feeding America Tampa Bay 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Andrew J. Bartlett 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE HNHNS01 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE BURTON 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanel Auto Parts Co. Concord NH 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Speare Memorial Hospital 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #86 266 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2758 204 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT PLYMOUTH STATE UNIV. PROSPECT 194 FTE
NAT-TCR Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Eau Claire Hospice 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : DFW6 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR E.M. Tharp 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Garden Cut 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilco Technologies Plant 3 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marinemax East, Inc.-Pom 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE NC Works Inc. 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.