Nursing homes · Ohio

Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabililtation Center

Cincinnati, OH · ~120 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
29.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabililtation Center runs at 451% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.

Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabililtation Center: 29.3 TCR = 451% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabililtation Center safety composite

Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabililtation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 29.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 31.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabililtation Center: 24.7 → 33.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 33.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.09× in 2021

Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabililtation Center's TCR rose 9.2 from 24.7 in 2020 to 33.9 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Cincinnati, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 29.3 · 451% of ind

  • DART 31.9 DART
  • RANK #1072/1074
  • PHOTO Rural Healthacare Ce…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rural Healthacare Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabililtation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabililtation Center averages 29.3 TCR (451% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabililtation Center TCR series: 2020=24.7 · 2021=33.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabililtation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1072 safest of 1074 Nursing homes employers in Ohio.

Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabililtation Center (120 employees, TCR 29.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabililtation Center
Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabililtation Center (120 employees, TCR 29.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabililtation Center has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 33.9 31.9 5 29 0
2020 24.7 24.7 3 29 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Cincinnati

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rural Healthacare Center 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakeland Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerald Pointe Health and Rehabilitation 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of Morgan City 29.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAM Industrial Solutions @ Cenovus 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMS Corporation 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Messer Construction Co. - Columbus Region 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baker DC, LLC 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Springfield Food 29.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0524 Orange 29.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Petersburg Ofc/Whse 29.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AN3 Logisitcs LLC 29.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 42321a - Brooklyn Dc 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE 43171l - Louisville Dc 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fortis Solutions Group (Virginia Beach) 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE AirBorn, Inc. Little Falls 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.