Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system · Arizona

Hilltop Wastewater Treatment Plant

Kingman, AZ · ~6 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hilltop Wastewater Treatment Plant runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade D.

Hilltop Wastewater Treatment Plant: 2.1 TCR = 173% of Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hilltop Wastewater Treatment Plant safety composite

Hilltop Wastewater Treatment Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hilltop Wastewater Treatment Plant held a steady TCR band

Hilltop Wastewater Treatment Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 16.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=16.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Kingman, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.1 · 173% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/10
  • PHOTO Burbank
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~6 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Burbank (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Hilltop Wastewater Treatment Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hilltop Wastewater Treatment Plant averages 2.1 TCR (173% of the Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hilltop Wastewater Treatment Plant TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=16.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Hilltop Wastewater Treatment Plant falls in its industry

400 Waste collection, treatment, a establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 10 Waste collection, treatment, a employers in Arizona.

Hilltop Wastewater Treatment Plant (6 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hilltop Wastewater Treatment Plant
Hilltop Wastewater Treatment Plant (6 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Hilltop Wastewater Treatment Plant has fewer employees than the Waste collection, treatment, and disposa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 16.6 8.3 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · AZ · Kingman

400 Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 135 employers in Kingman, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Burbank 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village of Addison - Sewer Department 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Novato Sanitary District 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Downtown Wastewater Treatment Plant 6 FTE
STATE-SIZE Modern Group Management LLC 6 FTE
STATE-SIZE TUS 6 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chino Valley 7 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kingman Healthcare Inc. 1,939 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Woodmark Coorporation, Kingman AZ Plant 568 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2051 508 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2051 448 FTE
NAT-TCR Munschauer, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR AMP-Cherokee Environmental Solutions 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Signature Homes Main Office 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Benton Harbor 2.1 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.