Hotels (except casino hotels) · New York

Hilton Garden Inn College Town

Rochester, NY · ~91 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hilton Garden Inn College Town runs at 154% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade D.

Hilton Garden Inn College Town: 4.6 TCR = 154% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hilton Garden Inn College Town safety composite

Hilton Garden Inn College Town scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hilton Garden Inn College Town: 4.2 → 11.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.72× in 2024

Hilton Garden Inn College Town's TCR rose 6.9 from 4.2 in 2016 to 11.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Rochester, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 154% of ind

  • DART 7.9 DART
  • RANK #196/403
  • PHOTO Hilton Garden Inn Ch…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Midway (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Hilton Garden Inn College Town in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hilton Garden Inn College Town averages 4.6 TCR (154% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hilton Garden Inn College Town TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=4 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=11.1 · BLS 3.0

Where Hilton Garden Inn College Town falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #196 safest of 403 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in New York.

Hilton Garden Inn College Town (91 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hilton Garden Inn College Town
Hilton Garden Inn College Town (91 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hilton Garden Inn College Town has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.1 7.9 7 0 0
2023 3.1 0.0 2 0 0
2022 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2020 5.5 5.5 1 1 0
2019 5.2 3.9 3 1 0
2018 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2017 4.0 2.7 3 0 0
2016 4.2 1.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · NY · Rochester

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Midway 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holiday Inn 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2405-Hyatt Place Chicago River N 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Embassy Suites by Hilton Tucson East 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE O&M Poughkeepsie 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE IPC Resiliency Partners 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pooler Enterprises, Inc. 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brill Inc. 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR Corinth MS 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 077 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Martin Roofing Co., Inc 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kamatics Corporation 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aegis Living Home Office 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aegis of Fremont 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denver, CO 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flex-Strut, Inc. 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.