Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Aegis of Fremont

Fremont, CA · ~91 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aegis of Fremont runs at 421% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Aegis of Fremont: 16.0 TCR = 421% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aegis of Fremont safety composite

Aegis of Fremont scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2024

Aegis of Fremont injury rate improved

Aegis of Fremont's TCR fell 4.8 from 9.1 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 43.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.1 · 2017=10.4 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=19.1 · 2021=13.3 · 2022=43.6 · 2023=32.5 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fremont, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.0 · 421% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #520/635
  • PHOTO KRE-BSL HUSKY EVANS …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KRE-BSL HUSKY EVANS PARK OPERATION LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Aegis of Fremont in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aegis of Fremont averages 16.0 TCR (421% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aegis of Fremont TCR series: 2016=9.1 · 2017=10.4 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=19.1 · 2021=13.3 · 2022=43.6 · 2023=32.5 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Aegis of Fremont falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #520 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Aegis of Fremont (91 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Aegis of Fremont
Aegis of Fremont (91 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Aegis of Fremont has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 2.9 2 1 0
2023 32.5 32.5 9 14 0
2022 43.6 42.1 5 24 0
2021 13.3 11.8 2 7 0
2020 19.1 19.1 0 14 0
2019 6.5 3.9 5 0 0
2018 5.1 5.1 4 0 0
2017 10.4 10.4 9 0 0
2016 9.1 6.5 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Fremont

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 348 employers in Fremont, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY EVANS PARK OPERATION LLC 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Tequesta Memory Care 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royal Columbian Retirement Inn 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eagle Lake Village 16.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CDK Agriculture, Inc. 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Belridge 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Micro Paradox 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFS, LP. 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-45500 Fremont Blvd 21,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-Factory 12,707 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 517 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lam Research Corp. Fremont Campus 2,887 FTE
NAT-TCR TXD089 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kre-Bsl Husky Evans Park Operation LLC 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Laurels of Coldwater 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Veneta Grocery Outlet 16.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aegis Living Home Office 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn College Town 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denver, CO 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flex-Strut, Inc. 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.