Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · California

Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco

South San Francisco, CA · ~64 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade C.

Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco: 2.7 TCR = 90% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco safety composite

Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco: 0.0 → 6.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 6.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.24× in 2018

Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco's TCR rose 6.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 2.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · South San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 90% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #111/1298
  • PHOTO WG Myrtle Beach
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WG Myrtle Beach (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco averages 2.7 TCR (90% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2 · 2018=6.1 · BLS 3.0

Where Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #111 safest of 1298 Hotel management services (i.e employers in California.

Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco (64 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco
Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco (64 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco has more employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.1 6.1 3 0 0
2017 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · CA · South San Francisco

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 136 employers in South San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WG Myrtle Beach 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairfield Inn & Suite 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madison Hampton 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holiday Inn Express SFO South 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms, Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDERA 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGS FARM LABOR CORPORATION 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arroyo Seco Vineyards, Inc 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Genentech SSF 13,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120951 1,497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspiranet 1,182 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02620951 1,178 FTE
NAT-TCR Continental Carbon Company Phenix City 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ArcelorMittal Conshohocken 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Charter Homes & Neighborhoods 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Council Bluffs Branch 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3495-11DA203 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE 001 TRC Corporate Office 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manufacturing 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sales - Bali Hai Villas 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.