Commercial Physical and Biological Research · California

Genentech SSF

Name: Genentech SSF Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

South San Francisco, CA · ~13,259 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 1.1
Avg TCR: 0.5
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Genentech SSF runs at 216% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial Physical and Biological Research workplace, earning a grade F.

Genentech SSF: 1.1 TCR = 216% of Commercial Physical and Biological Research BLS 0.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Genentech SSF safety composite

Genentech SSF scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers
DART rate: F 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2024

Genentech SSF injury rate improved

Genentech SSF's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.3 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.3 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.0 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541714 · South San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 1.1 · 216% of ind

DART 0.4 DART
RANK #1/5
PHOTO Oxford Nanoimaging Inc
BOOK 6y book
INJ 284 inj
SIZE ~13,259 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oxford Nanoimaging Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pleasanton, CA

1.5
Oxford Nanoima

1.2
This site

1.1
Minnetonka, MN

0.8
HQ & FIELD

0.7

What this shows Genentech SSF averages 1.1 TCR (216% of the Commercial Physical and Biological Research BLS benchmark).

Genentech SSF TCR series: 2017=1.3 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 0.5

Where Genentech SSF falls in its industry

21 Commercial Physical and Biolog establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Commercial Physical and Biolog employers in California.

Genentech SSF (13,259 employees, TCR 1.1) among 7 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 915 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Genentech SSF has more employees than the Commercial Physical and Biological Resea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2024	0.9	0.4	41	52
2023	0.9	0.3	29	67
2020	1.0	0.5	27	90
2019	1.1	0.4	54	81
2018	1.3	0.6	65	103
2017	1.3	0.5	68	108

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541714 · CA · South San Francisco

21 Commercial Physical and Biological Research employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 136 employers in South San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Oxford Nanoimaging Inc	SAN DIEGO, CA	1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Minnetonka, MN	MINNETONKA, MN	0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Pleasanton, CA	PLEASANTON, CA	1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	HQ & FIELD	MASON, OH	0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	6017-USA UNITED STATES - WAH - CA	CUPERTINO	13,009 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Mission Palms Healthcare Center	WESTMINSTER	12,800 FTE
STATE-SIZE	NA-US-CA-Fremont-Factory	FREMONT	12,707 FTE
STATE-SIZE	DoorDash, Inc.	SAN FRANCISCO	12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR	2032-02120951	South San Francisco	1,497 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Aspiranet	South San Francisco	1,182 FTE
CITY-NEAR	0206-02620951	South San Francisco	1,178 FTE
CITY-NEAR	SAN BRUNO (CASBR)	South San Francisco	1,177 FTE
NAT-TCR	Metropolitan Airport Authority of Peoria	Peoria, IL	1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	CBS - Kennesaw	Kennesaw, GA	1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Expeditors	Romulus, MI	1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Baltimore BWI	Harmans, MD	1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Division 50 University of Rochester	Rochester, NY	13,244 FTE
NAT-SIZE	WFBMC - Winston Campus	Winston Salem, NC	13,298 FTE
NAT-SIZE	University of Pittsburgh-Oakland	Pittsburgh, PA	13,208 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Nationwide Children's Hospital	Columbus, OH	13,367 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.