Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) · Washington

Hilton Garden Inn Seattle Downtown

Seattle, WA · ~65 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hilton Garden Inn Seattle Downtown runs at 141% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) workplace, earning a grade D.

Hilton Garden Inn Seattle Downtown: 4.2 TCR = 141% of Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hilton Garden Inn Seattle Downtown safety composite

Hilton Garden Inn Seattle Downtown scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2017→2023

Hilton Garden Inn Seattle Downtown injury rate improved

Hilton Garden Inn Seattle Downtown's TCR fell 1.8 from 5.5 in 2017 to 3.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.5 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 141% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #74/172
  • PHOTO BNANS - Towneplace S…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BNANS - Towneplace Suites by Marriott (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Hilton Garden Inn Seattle Downtown in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hilton Garden Inn Seattle Downtown averages 4.2 TCR (141% of the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hilton Garden Inn Seattle Downtown TCR series: 2017=5.5 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=3.7 · BLS 3.0

Where Hilton Garden Inn Seattle Downtown falls in its industry

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 172 Alpine skiing facilities with employers in Washington.

Hilton Garden Inn Seattle Downtown (65 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hilton Garden Inn Seattle Downtown
Hilton Garden Inn Seattle Downtown (65 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hilton Garden Inn Seattle Downtown has more employees than the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2017 5.5 3.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · WA · Seattle

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BNANS - Towneplace Suites by Marriott 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sonesta ES Suites Fresno 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sonesta Anaheim 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hyatt Regency New Brunswick 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Double R Hop Ranches Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE JR Simplot Company-LL-Pasco Feedlot 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seafisher 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alaska Spirit 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #198 CORBIN, KY 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Shenandoah Work Center 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mahle Behr Dayton LLC 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Beavercreek Health and Rehab 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Caseyville Nursing and Rehab 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lawrenceville, GA 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mahle Engine Components 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Casey Health Care 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.