Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable (except potato) dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production · California

HM Clause - Dixon Research Station

Dixon, CA · ~17 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HM Clause - Dixon Research Station runs at 227% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable (except potato) dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production workplace, earning a grade F.

HM Clause - Dixon Research Station: 10.2 TCR = 227% of Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable (except potato) dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HM Clause - Dixon Research Station safety composite

HM Clause - Dixon Research Station scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

HM Clause - Dixon Research Station: 11.7 → 16.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 18.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.63× in 2024

HM Clause - Dixon Research Station's TCR rose 4.9 from 11.7 in 2017 to 16.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 18.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111219 · Dixon, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 227% of ind

  • DART 16.6 DART
  • RANK #157/175
  • PHOTO Hardee Farm
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~17 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hardee Farm (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

HM Clause - Dixon Research Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HM Clause - Dixon Research Station averages 10.2 TCR (227% of the Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable (except potato) dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HM Clause - Dixon Research Station TCR series: 2017=11.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=7.5 · 2022=17.4 · 2023=18.4 · 2024=16.6 · BLS 4.5

Where HM Clause - Dixon Research Station falls in its industry

331 Vegetable and potato farming, establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #157 safest of 175 Vegetable and potato farming, employers in California.

HM Clause - Dixon Research Station (17 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate HM Clause - Dixon Research Station
HM Clause - Dixon Research Station (17 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5

HM Clause - Dixon Research Station has fewer employees than the Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.6 16.6 2 0 0
2023 18.4 9.2 2 0 0
2022 17.4 8.7 1 1 0
2020 7.5 7.5 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 11.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111219 · CA · Dixon

331 Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable (except potato) dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 64 employers in Dixon, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hardee Farm 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hudson Valley Farm Hub LLC 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR JK FARMS 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFFF-Oxnard 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Laub Ranches Inc 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sherwood Equipment Inc 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barton Ranch, Inc. 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fillmore Farms 17 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 174 2,579 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayoral Brothers Incoporated Farm Labor Contractor 375 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5139 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5139 300 FTE
NAT-TCR MANCHESTER 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Bemidji 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Emporia Plant 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Desert Steel, LLC 10.2 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.