Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled spirits, wine), merchant wholesalers · Missouri

HOA Springfield

Springfield, MO · ~166 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HOA Springfield runs at 396% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled spirits, wine), merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

HOA Springfield: 8.7 TCR = 396% of Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled spirits, wine), merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HOA Springfield safety composite

HOA Springfield scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2016→2024

HOA Springfield injury rate improved

HOA Springfield's TCR fell 8.0 from 12.4 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.4 · 2017=11.4 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=7.0 · 2022=11.6 · 2023=9.0 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424810 · Springfield, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 396% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #17/20
  • PHOTO Salisbury Division
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 109 inj
  • SIZE ~166 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Salisbury Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

HOA Springfield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HOA Springfield averages 8.7 TCR (396% of the Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled spirits, wine), merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HOA Springfield TCR series: 2016=12.4 · 2017=11.4 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=7 · 2022=11.6 · 2023=9 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 2.2

Where HOA Springfield falls in its industry

664 Beverages, alcoholic (except d establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 20 Beverages, alcoholic (except d employers in Missouri.

HOA Springfield (166 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate HOA Springfield
HOA Springfield (166 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 6.4

HOA Springfield has more employees than the Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 2.5 7 0 0
2023 9.0 7.7 14 0 0
2022 11.6 9.6 17 0 0
2021 7.0 4.9 10 0 0
2020 9.4 4.4 13 0 0
2019 5.5 2.8 8 0 0
2018 7.8 4.6 12 0 0
2017 11.4 6.1 15 0 0
2016 12.4 2.9 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424810 · MO · Springfield

664 Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled spirits, wine), merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 633 employers in Springfield, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Salisbury Division 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8327_18975 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6378-63780013 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silver Eagle Distributors, L.P. - Cypress 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 8th Avenue Food & Provisions 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quaker Window Co. - Wood Facility 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elantas PDG, Inc. 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delong's, Inc. 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL SPRINGFIELD 4,885 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime, Inc. HQ 3,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corp 3,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bass Pro Corporate 1,888 FTE
NAT-TCR DHS-Cherokee Mental Health Institute 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR AFD 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Village at Luther Ridge 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0665 Grosse Pointe 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE P&Wc Component Repairs 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #6507 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kelley Trucking Inc. 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crestview Rehabilitation Center 166 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.