Continuing care retirement communities · Pennsylvania

The Village at Luther Ridge

Chambersburg, PA · ~102 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Village at Luther Ridge runs at 229% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Village at Luther Ridge: 8.7 TCR = 229% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Village at Luther Ridge safety composite

The Village at Luther Ridge scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Village at Luther Ridge: 6.8 → 8.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 13.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.86× in 2024

The Village at Luther Ridge's TCR rose 1.9 from 6.8 in 2016 to 8.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Chambersburg, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 229% of ind

  • DART 7.5 DART
  • RANK #155/257
  • PHOTO Andover Court Assist…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Andover Court Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

The Village at Luther Ridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Village at Luther Ridge averages 8.7 TCR (229% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Village at Luther Ridge TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=11.2 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=13.7 · 2020=12.8 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=9.5 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=8.8 · BLS 3.8

Where The Village at Luther Ridge falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #155 safest of 257 Continuing care retirement com employers in Pennsylvania.

The Village at Luther Ridge (102 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Village at Luther Ridge
The Village at Luther Ridge (102 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Village at Luther Ridge has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.8 7.5 7 0 0
2023 6.3 3.8 5 0 0
2022 9.5 6.3 6 0 0
2021 4.9 3.3 3 0 0
2020 12.8 11.2 8 0 0
2019 13.7 7.6 9 0 0
2018 4.7 2.3 2 0 0
2017 11.2 8.9 5 0 0
2016 6.8 6.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Chambersburg

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 144 employers in Chambersburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Andover Court Assisted Living 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR GA-KNUTE-GRAND ARBOR 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dominion Hixson, LLC 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dayspring Villa 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verano PA CPG - Agri-Kind 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE McKee Management Associates, Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bakers Pittsburgh 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Structures Division 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chambersburg Hospital 2,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan Chambersburg Hospital 2,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0589 - Chambersburg PA DC 1,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0589 - Chambersburg DC 1,049 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0665 Grosse Pointe 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Feeders, Inc. 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1111 - NSM Progress Ridge 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR HOA Springfield 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE J.T. Harrison Construction Co., Inc. 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Potato King Transportation, Inc. 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE C513 New Bern 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meister Log and Lumber 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.