Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · California

Holt AG Solutions Yuba City

Yuba City, CA · ~32 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Holt AG Solutions Yuba City runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

Holt AG Solutions Yuba City: 0.6 TCR = 27% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Holt AG Solutions Yuba City safety composite

Holt AG Solutions Yuba City scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Holt AG Solutions Yuba City held a steady TCR band

Holt AG Solutions Yuba City's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Yuba City, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/148
  • PHOTO Savannah Port Wentwo…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Savannah Port Wentworth Depot (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Holt AG Solutions Yuba City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Holt AG Solutions Yuba City averages 0.6 TCR (27% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Holt AG Solutions Yuba City TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Holt AG Solutions Yuba City falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 148 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in California.

Holt AG Solutions Yuba City (32 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Holt AG Solutions Yuba City
Holt AG Solutions Yuba City (32 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Holt AG Solutions Yuba City has fewer employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · CA · Yuba City

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 123 employers in Yuba City, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Savannah Port Wentworth Depot 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MacAllister Machinery Indianapolis Headquarters 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Mid-America Heartland : SVC-Oklahoma OK-USA 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CED New Jersey 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Farms 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIVE POINTS T.I.C. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE OFFICE 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brocchini Farms Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuba City Unified School District 2,348 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sunsweet Growers 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR RMZ Farm Labor Services 609 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1903 462 FTE
NAT-TCR Corbins - Phoenix, Az 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SSI Lubricants LLC/Starfleet - Belle Glade 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Haslet, TX - Intermodal Parkwa 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Encore Concrete Construction, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Morningside Of Springfield 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Line Supply Co., Inc. - Dayton 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spiritwood Station 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 1094 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.