Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Home Health Care Professionals- Elmore

Elmore, MN · ~49 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Home Health Care Professionals- Elmore runs at 474% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Home Health Care Professionals- Elmore: 18.0 TCR = 474% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Home Health Care Professionals- Elmore safety composite

Home Health Care Professionals- Elmore scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Home Health Care Professionals- Elmore: 3.6 → 15.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 43.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.62× in 2023

Home Health Care Professionals- Elmore's TCR rose 12.2 from 3.6 in 2019 to 15.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 43.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Elmore, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.0 · 474% of ind

  • DART 11.3 DART
  • RANK #221/240
  • PHOTO FM Princeton, LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FM Princeton, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Home Health Care Professionals- Elmore in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Home Health Care Professionals- Elmore averages 18.0 TCR (474% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Home Health Care Professionals- Elmore TCR series: 2019=3.6 · 2020=43.9 · 2021=22.4 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=15.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Home Health Care Professionals- Elmore falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #221 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Home Health Care Professionals- Elmore (49 employees, TCR 18.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Home Health Care Professionals- Elmore
Home Health Care Professionals- Elmore (49 employees, TCR 18.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Home Health Care Professionals- Elmore has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 15.8 11.3 7 0 0
2022 4.4 2.7 5 0 0
2021 22.4 16.3 6 5 0
2020 43.9 34.7 7 12 0
2019 3.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Elmore

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FM Princeton, LLC 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Laguna Niguel 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valparaiso 1300 OPCO LLC DBA Aviva Valparaiso 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dale Commons 17.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Impact Power Solutions 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lodermeier's Inc 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glass & Mirror Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Building Systems, Ltd 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADAHL TRUCKING LLC 18 FTE
NAT-TCR Ceres Brunswick 18.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Desert Hot Springs 18.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 416572-Phi-Kingsessing Sta 18.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 216571-Nor-Algiers Sta a 18.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clinton Inn Hotel 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dept. of Natural Resources (6) 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE BJ Electrical 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dept. of Public Safety (21) 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.