Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · California

Home Office

El Cajon, CA · ~57 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Home Office runs at 198% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

Home Office: 5.7 TCR = 198% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Home Office safety composite

Home Office scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Home Office: 7.0 → 7.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 11.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.35× in 2024

Home Office's TCR rose 0.8 from 7.0 in 2018 to 7.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · El Cajon, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 198% of ind

  • DART 7.8 DART
  • RANK #397/486
  • PHOTO Victor Excavating
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Victor Excavating (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Home Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Home Office averages 5.7 TCR (198% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Home Office TCR series: 2018=7 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=11.2 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=7.8 · BLS 2.9

Where Home Office falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #397 safest of 486 Addition, alteration and renov employers in California.

Home Office (57 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Home Office
Home Office (57 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Home Office has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.8 7.8 3 0 0
2023 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 4.9 0.0 3 0 0
2020 11.2 1.9 6 0 0
2019 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 7.0 4.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · El Cajon

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 236 employers in El Cajon, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Victor Excavating 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Komro Sales & Service Inc. Durand, WI 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pine Island Warehouse 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanc Vineyards, LLC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE MI RANCHITO FARMING INC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmland Management Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR SOUTHERN REGION : SDU 1,176 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 370 1,148 FTE
CITY-NEAR GKN Aerospace Chem-tronics 1,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR GKN Aerospace Chem Tronics 938 FTE
NAT-TCR Revival Landscape Services, LLC 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR GNF, Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR North Richland Hills Plant 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kishwaukee Water Reclamation District 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Preferred Powder Coating 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE PNC Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mississippi Market E7 Store 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Professional Fabrications 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.