Meat Processed From Carcasses · Texas

North Richland Hills Plant

N Richland Hills, TX · ~342 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North Richland Hills Plant runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Meat Processed From Carcasses workplace, earning a grade D.

North Richland Hills Plant: 5.7 TCR = 174% of Meat Processed From Carcasses BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North Richland Hills Plant safety composite

North Richland Hills Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2017→2024

North Richland Hills Plant injury rate improved

North Richland Hills Plant's TCR fell 3.7 from 5.8 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.8 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=15.9 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311612 · N Richland Hills, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 174% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #32/51
  • PHOTO MAID RITE SPECIALTY …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 67 inj
  • SIZE ~342 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MAID RITE SPECIALTY FOODS INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

North Richland Hills Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North Richland Hills Plant averages 5.7 TCR (174% of the Meat Processed From Carcasses BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North Richland Hills Plant TCR series: 2017=5.8 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=15.9 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where North Richland Hills Plant falls in its industry

613 Meat Processed From Carcasses establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 51 Meat Processed From Carcasses employers in Texas.

North Richland Hills Plant (342 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate North Richland Hills Plant
North Richland Hills Plant (342 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4

North Richland Hills Plant has more employees than the Meat Processed From Carcasses median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 1.6 6 2 0
2023 4.6 2.5 9 8 0
2022 5.6 5.3 10 9 0
2020 15.9 15.9 3 55 0
2019 1.7 1.5 7 0 0
2018 4.3 3.9 16 2 0
2017 5.8 5.3 16 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311612 · TX · N Richland Hills

613 Meat Processed From Carcasses employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 8 employers in N Richland Hills, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MAID RITE SPECIALTY FOODS INC 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buckhead Beef of Atlanta 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burgers Smokehouse Headquarters 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stock Yards Spokane 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ambrose Construction 342 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc. 342 FTE
STATE-SIZE Owens-Illinois 342 FTE
STATE-SIZE James Hardie Building Products 342 FTE
CITY-NEAR CWY 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smurfit Kappa - Fort Worth 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 368 - North Richland Hills 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0540 N RICHLAND 97 FTE
NAT-TCR Kishwaukee Water Reclamation District 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Roof Check INC 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Home Office 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Revival Landscape Services, LLC 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Los Angeles Police Department, Hollywood Division 342 FTE
NAT-SIZE Howard County Highway Department 342 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Lenoir 342 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fiesta Tableware Company 342 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.