Employee benefit plans, third-party administrative processing services · Nevada

Hometown Health/Insurance Board 500 + 510

Reno, NV · ~679 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hometown Health/Insurance Board 500 + 510 runs at 222% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Employee benefit plans, third-party administrative processing services workplace, earning a grade F.

Hometown Health/Insurance Board 500 + 510: 1.1 TCR = 222% of Employee benefit plans, third-party administrative processing services BLS 0.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hometown Health/Insurance Board 500 + 510 safety composite

Hometown Health/Insurance Board 500 + 510 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2021

Hometown Health/Insurance Board 500 + 510 injury rate improved

Hometown Health/Insurance Board 500 + 510's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 524292 · Reno, NV ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 1.1 · 222% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P29
  • PHOTO MEBA Medical and Ben…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 66 inj
  • SIZE ~679 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MEBA Medical and Benefits Plan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

Hometown Health/Insurance Board 500 + 510 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hometown Health/Insurance Board 500 + 510 averages 1.1 TCR (222% of the Employee benefit plans, third-party administrative processing services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hometown Health/Insurance Board 500 + 510 TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Hometown Health/Insurance Board 500 + 510 falls in its industry

21 Employee benefit plans, third- establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Hometown Health/Insurance Board 500 + 510 (679 employees, TCR 1.1) among 14 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 15 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Hometown Health/Insurance Board 500 + 510
Hometown Health/Insurance Board 500 + 510 (679 employees, TCR 1.1) among 14 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Hometown Health/Insurance Board 500 + 510 has more employees than the Employee benefit plans, third-party admi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 6 3 0
2020 1.6 0.5 7 3 0
2019 0.0 0.0 15 3 0
2018 1.9 0.4 10 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 5 2 0
2016 3.1 0.7 23 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

524292 · NV · Reno

21 Employee benefit plans, third-party administrative processing services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 611 employers in Reno, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MEBA Medical and Benefits Plan 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lifetime Benefit Solutions - Techniplex 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Discovery Benefits 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHEONIX - UNIVERSITY DR 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE DRock 676 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cheyenne Hauling Company 683 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edgewater Hotel and Casino 683 FTE
STATE-SIZE NV Energy-Pearson 674 FTE
CITY-NEAR Univeristy of Nevada, Reno 7,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Nevada, Reno 7,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renown Regional Hospital 3,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renown Regional Medical Center 200 3,582 FTE
NAT-TCR Angleboard 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR RENEW Headquarters 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ASPLUNDH 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Patheon Thermo Fisher 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Moncks Corner Offuce 679 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sysco USA-1 Houston 679 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tucson Fire 679 FTE
NAT-SIZE Benore Logistic Systems, Inc. - Greer 679 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.