Retirement communities, continuing care · Pennsylvania

Homewood at Spring House Estates

Everett, PA · ~33 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Homewood at Spring House Estates runs at 151% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Homewood at Spring House Estates: 5.7 TCR = 151% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Homewood at Spring House Estates safety composite

Homewood at Spring House Estates scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2016→2023

Homewood at Spring House Estates injury rate improved

Homewood at Spring House Estates's TCR fell 11.6 from 14.9 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.9 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=15.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Everett, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 151% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #85/257
  • PHOTO Quail Lodge
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quail Lodge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Homewood at Spring House Estates in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Homewood at Spring House Estates averages 5.7 TCR (151% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Homewood at Spring House Estates TCR series: 2016=14.9 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=15.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Homewood at Spring House Estates falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #85 safest of 257 Retirement communities, contin employers in Pennsylvania.

Homewood at Spring House Estates (33 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Homewood at Spring House Estates
Homewood at Spring House Estates (33 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Homewood at Spring House Estates has fewer employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.5 0.0 0 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 15.2 15.2 1 4 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 14.9 10.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Everett

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 15 employers in Everett, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quail Lodge 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colonial Gardens 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laclede Groves 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Presence Fox Knoll 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Caputo & Guest 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colver Power Project 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oil City 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norristown Operations 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1684 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1684 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Triangle Hardwoods 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pennknoll Village 97 FTE
NAT-TCR Ihop 4420 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mathewson Lane 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #1323 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 5855 - Springfield-MA 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE USA Yeast Company 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Construction Resources Group 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Nutmeg Companies, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pure Air Filtration, LLC 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.