Fabricated structural metal manufacturing · Arkansas

Construction Resources Group

Russellville, AR · ~33 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Construction Resources Group runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fabricated structural metal manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Construction Resources Group: 0.9 TCR = 28% of Fabricated structural metal manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Construction Resources Group safety composite

Construction Resources Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2017→2023

Construction Resources Group injury rate improved

Construction Resources Group's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Russellville, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/14
  • PHOTO CMC Rebar Brighton
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CMC Rebar Brighton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Construction Resources Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Construction Resources Group averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the Fabricated structural metal manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Construction Resources Group TCR series: 2017=3.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Construction Resources Group falls in its industry

1,491 Fabricated structural metal ma establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 14 Fabricated structural metal ma employers in Arkansas.

Construction Resources Group (33 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Construction Resources Group
Construction Resources Group (33 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Construction Resources Group has fewer employees than the Fabricated structural metal manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · AR · Russellville

1,491 Fabricated structural metal manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 113 employers in Russellville, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CMC Rebar Brighton 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The STI group Fab, Bmt 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frazier Industrial Company 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mitsubishi Chemical America- ALPOLIC Division 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE ITC Hatchery 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fiber Resource Division 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entergy, Lake Catherine Plant 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rich Mountain Electric Cooperative, Inc. 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Russellville,AR 1,303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arkansas Nuclear One 1,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Road Plant 643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transco Lines, Inc 586 FTE
NAT-TCR Seven Oaks Millwork, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Katrein Manu Office - Ericsson 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR South Heritage Health & Rehabilitation Center 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #1998 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Homewood at Spring House Estates 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Nutmeg Companies, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pure Air Filtration, LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Soyfoods of America 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.