Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · North Carolina

Honda Aero, Inc.

Burlington, NC · ~101 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Honda Aero, Inc. runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Honda Aero, Inc.: 0.9 TCR = 28% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Honda Aero, Inc. safety composite

Honda Aero, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Honda Aero, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Honda Aero, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Burlington, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/15
  • PHOTO Johnson Technology, …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Johnson Technology, Inc. - Norton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Honda Aero, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Honda Aero, Inc. averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Honda Aero, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Honda Aero, Inc. falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 15 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in North Carolina.

Honda Aero, Inc. (101 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Honda Aero, Inc.
Honda Aero, Inc. (101 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Honda Aero, Inc. has fewer employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2020 2.1 1.0 2 0 0
2019 1.6 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.8 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · NC · Burlington

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 148 employers in Burlington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Johnson Technology, Inc. - Norton 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain Evendale OH 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt & Whitney Autoair, Inc (Plants 1-5) 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unison Industries Norwich 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greensboro Resource Center - PNG 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barringer Construction, LLC 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Services 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carrier Commercial Services (Charlotte Northwoods) 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR National OnDemand, Inc 511 FTE
CITY-NEAR Twin Lakes Community 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR York Road 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County 373 FTE
NAT-TCR Excavating 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bridgeport Terminal 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-Community Ambulance Service 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CTRM - Delivery 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE TCA 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Artimus Construction, inc. 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quikrete - Lax 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Development Workshop, Inc. Idaho Falls 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.