Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing · Ohio

Honda Engineering N America - Anna

Anna, OH · ~168 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Honda Engineering N America - Anna runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Honda Engineering N America - Anna: 0.7 TCR = 21% of Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Honda Engineering N America - Anna safety composite

Honda Engineering N America - Anna scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2020

Honda Engineering N America - Anna injury rate improved

Honda Engineering N America - Anna's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.7 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Anna, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/39
  • PHOTO WILMINGTON PRECISION…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~168 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WILMINGTON PRECISION MACHINING, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Honda Engineering N America - Anna in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Honda Engineering N America - Anna averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Honda Engineering N America - Anna TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Honda Engineering N America - Anna falls in its industry

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 39 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma employers in Ohio.

Honda Engineering N America - Anna (168 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Honda Engineering N America - Anna
Honda Engineering N America - Anna (168 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Honda Engineering N America - Anna has more employees than the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.7 0.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · OH · Anna

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 10 employers in Anna, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WILMINGTON PRECISION MACHINING, INC. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belvac- Main 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jergens Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR JV Manufacturing - Plant 15 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eramet Marietta Incorporated 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wheatland Tube - Warren, OH 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bescast 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Whirlaway Corporation Plant 2 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anna Engine Plant 3,380 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wells Brothers, Inc. 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR Agrana Fruit US, Inc. Botkins 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR Koenig Equipment- Anna, OH 35 FTE
NAT-TCR Brighton Service Center 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : MGM - Montgomery 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Bay Packaging Shipping Container Division 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 107-Tri Supply Co 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harrington/Nichols Station 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE LeClaire MFG Foundry 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hillsborough Operations 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hu-Friedy Des Plaines 168 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.