Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing · Ohio

Wilmington Precision Machining, Inc.

Wilmington, OH · ~52 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wilmington Precision Machining, Inc. runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Wilmington Precision Machining, Inc.: 0.7 TCR = 21% of Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wilmington Precision Machining, Inc. safety composite

Wilmington Precision Machining, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2024

Wilmington Precision Machining, Inc. injury rate improved

Wilmington Precision Machining, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Wilmington, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/39
  • PHOTO Belvac- Main
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Belvac- Main (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Wilmington Precision Machining, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wilmington Precision Machining, Inc. averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wilmington Precision Machining, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Wilmington Precision Machining, Inc. falls in its industry

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 39 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma employers in Ohio.

Wilmington Precision Machining, Inc. (52 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wilmington Precision Machining, Inc.
Wilmington Precision Machining, Inc. (52 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Wilmington Precision Machining, Inc. has fewer employees than the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2016 2.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · OH · Wilmington

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 62 employers in Wilmington, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Belvac- Main 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Honda Engineering N America - Anna 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jergens Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR JV Manufacturing - Plant 15 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Massillon 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Home Solar Columbus 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hartwell 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Daimler Group 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR R+L Carriers - WIL 1,903 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : KILN 1,315 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - KILN 1,209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ahresty Wilmington Corp. 752 FTE
NAT-TCR Nestle Purina Clinton IA 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ACE- Atlantic Regional Office 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Eppendorf North America 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Longhorn Plant 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maplewood Packing Inc 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE OFS BRANDS Plant #18 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Witherup 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Documotion Research, Inc. 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.