Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Connecticut

Honey Cell Inc

Bridgeport, CT · ~43 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Honey Cell Inc runs at 340% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade F.

Honey Cell Inc: 11.2 TCR = 340% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Honey Cell Inc safety composite

Honey Cell Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2016→2024

Honey Cell Inc injury rate improved

Honey Cell Inc's TCR fell 7.7 from 10.1 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 22.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.1 · 2017=22.3 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=11.8 · 2020=8.5 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=20.2 · 2023=13.4 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Bridgeport, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.2 · 340% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/12
  • PHOTO Premier Packaging, L…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Premier Packaging, LLC- RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Honey Cell Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Honey Cell Inc averages 11.2 TCR (340% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Honey Cell Inc TCR series: 2016=10.1 · 2017=22.3 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=11.8 · 2020=8.5 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=20.2 · 2023=13.4 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Honey Cell Inc falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 12 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Connecticut.

Honey Cell Inc (43 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Honey Cell Inc
Honey Cell Inc (43 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Honey Cell Inc has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 13.4 11.2 6 0 0
2022 20.2 12.6 6 2 0
2021 2.5 1.9 3 1 0
2020 8.5 8.5 4 0 0
2019 11.8 11.8 5 0 0
2018 9.8 9.8 4 0 0
2017 22.3 17.9 9 1 0
2016 10.1 7.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · CT · Bridgeport

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 150 employers in Bridgeport, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Premier Packaging, LLC- RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caylym Home AVE 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PREMIER PACKAGING PRODUCTS, INC. 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anchor Bay Packaging Corporation - Plant 4 10.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Franklin 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Middletown Power LLC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bismark Construction Company, Inc. 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paganelli Construction Corp 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridgeport Hospital 3,332 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Vincent's Medical Center - Bridgeport Campus 2,340 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST VINCENTS MEDICAL CENTER - BRIDGEPORT 2,273 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-CTBRI1 2,079 FTE
NAT-TCR San Antonio Paxton 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Scott's Industrial Coatings LLC 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Redwood Empire Remanufacturing 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR City Wide Construction Corp 11.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pride Neon, Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dakota Fence Company - Bismarck 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Market Haul -Est 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Wean Pig Transportation -Est 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.