Cut stock manufacturing · California

Redwood Empire Remanufacturing

Cloverdale, CA · ~40 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Redwood Empire Remanufacturing runs at 340% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cut stock manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Redwood Empire Remanufacturing: 11.2 TCR = 340% of Cut stock manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Redwood Empire Remanufacturing safety composite

Redwood Empire Remanufacturing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2017→2024

Redwood Empire Remanufacturing injury rate improved

Redwood Empire Remanufacturing's TCR fell 2.6 from 4.7 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 18.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.7 · 2018=12.9 · 2019=18.1 · 2021=15.5 · 2022=9.9 · 2023=15.3 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321912 · Cloverdale, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.2 · 340% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #9/10
  • PHOTO Elk Creek Forest Pro…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elk Creek Forest Products (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Redwood Empire Remanufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Redwood Empire Remanufacturing averages 11.2 TCR (340% of the Cut stock manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Redwood Empire Remanufacturing TCR series: 2017=4.7 · 2018=12.9 · 2019=18.1 · 2021=15.5 · 2022=9.9 · 2023=15.3 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Redwood Empire Remanufacturing falls in its industry

178 Cut stock manufacturing establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 10 Cut stock manufacturing employers in California.

Redwood Empire Remanufacturing (40 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Redwood Empire Remanufacturing
Redwood Empire Remanufacturing (40 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Redwood Empire Remanufacturing has fewer employees than the Cut stock manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2023 15.3 9.6 8 0 0
2022 9.9 5.9 4 1 0
2021 15.5 6.6 7 0 0
2019 18.1 15.1 6 0 0
2018 12.9 10.3 5 0 0
2017 4.7 2.4 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321912 · CA · Cloverdale

178 Cut stock manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 13 employers in Cloverdale, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elk Creek Forest Products 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holt and Bugbee Hardwoods 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tennessee Stave LLC 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Redwood Empire Morgan Hill 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Stackhouse Brothers 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE PISTACHIO HARVESTING, INC. 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Watsonville/San Juan Bautista 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gomez Growers 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCVM 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redwood Empire Sawmill 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cloverdale Healthcare Center 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cloverdale 75 FTE
NAT-TCR Scott's Industrial Coatings LLC 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Honey Cell Inc 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR City Wide Construction Corp 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fox River Grove Fire Protection District 11.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Commonwealth Excavating Inc 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rycon Construction, Inc - Fort Lauderdale 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bushel Basket Orchards, Inc 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shaffer Metal Fab, Inc. 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.