Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Alabama

Honeywell Anniston R&O

Name: Honeywell Anniston R&O Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Anniston, AL · ~197 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.5
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Honeywell Anniston R&O runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Honeywell Anniston R&O: 0.5 TCR = 14% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Honeywell Anniston R&O safety composite

Honeywell Anniston R&O scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers
DART rate: D 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2019

Honeywell Anniston R&O injury rate improved

Honeywell Anniston R&O's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.9 in 2017 to 0.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Anniston, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 14% of ind

DART 0.5 DART
RANK #6/13
PHOTO Circor Aerospace & D…
BOOK 3y book
INJ 3 inj
SIZE ~197 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Circor Aerospace & Defense (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.5
Circor Aerospa

0.5
Leading Edge C

0.5
Goodrich - Sen

0.5
NGAS-J102

0.5

What this shows Honeywell Anniston R&O averages 0.5 TCR (14% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Honeywell Anniston R&O TCR series: 2017=0.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Honeywell Anniston R&O falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 13 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Alabama.

Honeywell Anniston R&O (197 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Honeywell Anniston R&O has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2019	0.5	0.5	1
2018	0.0	0.0	0
2017	0.9	0.0	2

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · AL · Anniston

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 101 employers in Anniston, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Circor Aerospace & Defense	CORONA, CA	0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Leading Edge Composites	COATESVILLE, PA	0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Goodrich - Sensors and Integrated Systems - Vergennes VT	VERGENNES, VT	0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	NGAS-J102	TINKER AFB, OK	0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Spire Plaza	BIRMINGHAM	197 FTE
STATE-SIZE	2726 - I56/I20 Bridge	BIRMINGHAM	197 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Ancra Group : Kinedyne-Alabama	PRATTVILLE	197 FTE
STATE-SIZE	HomTex, Inc. Corporate	CULLMAN	197 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Tyler Union	Anniston	432 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Tyler Union Anniston	Anniston	420 FTE
CITY-NEAR	International Automotive Components	Anniston	346 FTE
CITY-NEAR	International Automotive Components Anniston	Anniston	344 FTE
NAT-TCR	CC Lyndhurst Campus	Lyndhurst, OH	0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	J.C. Harvesting Corporation	Royal Oaks, CA	0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	AkzoNobel Surface Chemistry LLC	Chattanooga, TN	0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Lenexa Facility	Lenexa, KS	0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Essex Nursing & Rehab	Louisville, KY	197 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Rockwell Collins Bellevue Operations	Bellevue, IA	197 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Jocar Enterprises Inc	Caguas, PR	197 FTE
NAT-SIZE	H&H Color Lab, Inc.	Raytown, MO	197 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.