Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Arizona

HoneywellAZ10

Tucson, AZ · ~425 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HoneywellAZ10 runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

HoneywellAZ10: 0.5 TCR = 14% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HoneywellAZ10 safety composite

HoneywellAZ10 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2020

HoneywellAZ10 injury rate improved

HoneywellAZ10's TCR fell 0.5 from 0.9 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Tucson, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #5/15
  • PHOTO Praxair GE Technolog…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~425 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Praxair GE Technologies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

HoneywellAZ10 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HoneywellAZ10 averages 0.5 TCR (14% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HoneywellAZ10 TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where HoneywellAZ10 falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 15 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Arizona.

HoneywellAZ10 (425 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate HoneywellAZ10
HoneywellAZ10 (425 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

HoneywellAZ10 has more employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2019 0.6 0.0 1 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2016 0.9 0.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · AZ · Tucson

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Praxair GE Technologies 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rolls-Royce: Banded Stator 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR P&W Elmendorf AFB F119 Engine Operation 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belac 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shearer's Foods - PHX 425 FTE
STATE-SIZE 21st Century Healthcare, Inc. 425 FTE
STATE-SIZE FRESH HARVEST, INC. - Arizona 427 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest 423 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR John Crane Chicago 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. - 3500 West Olive Ave 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tmx2000 - Terminix Corporate 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Therapeutic Resources Physical, Occupational and Speech Therapy Services, LLP 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE AK Steel - Headquarters, RIC, HG 425 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 32 - 35 425 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pro Wall Lath & Plaster 425 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mahomet-Seymour CUSD #3 425 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.