Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing · Michigan

HoneywellMI11

Boyne City, MI · ~147 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HoneywellMI11 runs at 6% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

HoneywellMI11: 0.2 TCR = 6% of Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HoneywellMI11 safety composite

HoneywellMI11 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

HoneywellMI11 held a steady TCR band

HoneywellMI11's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Boyne City, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 6% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO Raytheon_Huntsville_…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Raytheon_Huntsville_AL_Bob Heath Drive (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

HoneywellMI11 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HoneywellMI11 averages 0.2 TCR (6% of the Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HoneywellMI11 TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where HoneywellMI11 falls in its industry

388 Acceleration indicators and sy establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Acceleration indicators and sy employers in Michigan.

HoneywellMI11 (147 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate HoneywellMI11
HoneywellMI11 (147 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

HoneywellMI11 has fewer employees than the Acceleration indicators and systems comp median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · MI · Boyne City

388 Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 14 employers in Boyne City, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_Huntsville_AL_Bob Heath Drive 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Millersville Office 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SEACORP 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR HMAPF03 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Karn-Weadock Admin Building 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE B&B Electrical Contractors, Inc. 627 Circle Drive Iron Mountain MI 49801 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circuit Electric Inc 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Potlatch Land & Lumber, LLC. 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR LexaMar Corporation 625 FTE
CITY-NEAR Summertree Residential Centers 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Energy - Boyne 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Industrial Magnetics, Inc 117 FTE
NAT-TCR Diagnostics : Leica Biosystems (Aperio) - Vista 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR FIS Operations, LLC dba Frontier Integrity Solutions 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR James Hardie Building Products Chicago Office 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Eco Services Baton Rouge 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bay View Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE McKinley Chalet Resort 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Xo Windows, LLC 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Fraser Fitzgerald 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.