Jet propulsion and internal combustion engines and parts, aircraft, manufacturing · South Carolina

HoneywellSC09

Greer, SC · ~275 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HoneywellSC09 runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Jet propulsion and internal combustion engines and parts, aircraft, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

HoneywellSC09: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Jet propulsion and internal combustion engines and parts, aircraft, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HoneywellSC09 safety composite

HoneywellSC09 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

HoneywellSC09 held a steady TCR band

HoneywellSC09's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Greer, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Supply Chain : West …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~275 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Supply Chain : West Jefferson, NC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

HoneywellSC09 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HoneywellSC09 averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Jet propulsion and internal combustion engines and parts, aircraft, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HoneywellSC09 TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where HoneywellSC09 falls in its industry

366 Jet propulsion and internal co establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Jet propulsion and internal co employers in South Carolina.

HoneywellSC09 (275 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate HoneywellSC09
HoneywellSC09 (275 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

HoneywellSC09 has more employees than the Jet propulsion and internal combustion e median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.4 0.3 4 0 0
2021 1.1 0.7 3 0 0
2020 1.3 0.7 4 0 0
2019 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2018 1.1 0.8 3 0 0
2017 1.8 1.2 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · SC · Greer

366 Jet propulsion and internal combustion engines and parts, aircraft, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 204 employers in Greer, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain : West Jefferson, NC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ozark Aeroworks, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Textron Systems - Lycoming Engines 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCC Airfoils 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Food Packaging : BEECH ISLAND 275 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tyger River 275 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fort Mill - HSEMS 275 FTE
STATE-SIZE 042-PL001 274 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC 11,860 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utility Partners of America 1,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plastic Omnium Auto Exteriors, LLC 959 FTE
CITY-NEAR PRISMA HEALTH GREER MEDICAL CAMPUS 853 FTE
NAT-TCR Austin Powder Great Lakes LLC - Findlay 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 52nd Logistics 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Braco Window Cleaning Service, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lafayette Engine Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE NJ004 275 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercedes Dmb 275 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stew Leonard's - Newington 275 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cummins Emission Solutions Stoughton 275 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.