Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work · South Carolina

Utility Partners of America

Greer, SC · ~1,095 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Utility Partners of America runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work workplace, earning a grade A.

Utility Partners of America: 0.7 TCR = 26% of Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Utility Partners of America safety composite

Utility Partners of America scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Utility Partners of America held a steady TCR band

Utility Partners of America's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.8 in 2022 to 0.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.8 · 2023=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Greer, SC AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #10/47
  • PHOTO United Electric Comp…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~1,095 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: United Electric Company Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Utility Partners of America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Utility Partners of America averages 0.7 TCR (26% of the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Utility Partners of America TCR series: 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Utility Partners of America falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 47 Electrical, electrical wiring, employers in South Carolina.

Utility Partners of America (1,095 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Utility Partners of America
Utility Partners of America (1,095 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Utility Partners of America has more employees than the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low v median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.7 0.7 6 0 0
2022 0.8 0.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · SC · Greer

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 204 employers in Greer, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR United Electric Company Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DelSignore Electrical Contractors, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CALDWELL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR IES Commercial, Inc. 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE SCCAH - COLUMBIA AIR HUB 1,095 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson County Government 1,093 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michelin Americas Research Center - MARC 1,101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods 1,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC 11,860 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plastic Omnium Auto Exteriors, LLC 959 FTE
CITY-NEAR PRISMA HEALTH GREER MEDICAL CAMPUS 853 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREER MEDICAL CAMPUS 743 FTE
NAT-TCR Secant Group, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta Main 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Ambrose University 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Metals USA Grand Rapids Location #545 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ohio Edison Company 1,095 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH2 1,095 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Charles Operations - Taft 1,095 FTE
NAT-SIZE PHX1 1,096 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.