Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing · Indiana

Hoosier Gasket Corp.

Indianapolis, IN · ~129 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hoosier Gasket Corp. runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Hoosier Gasket Corp.: 3.5 TCR = 105% of Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hoosier Gasket Corp. safety composite

Hoosier Gasket Corp. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2016→2021

Hoosier Gasket Corp. injury rate improved

Hoosier Gasket Corp.'s TCR fell 5.9 from 6.7 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.7 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339991 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 105% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/15
  • PHOTO James Walker Mfg. Co.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: James Walker Mfg. Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Hoosier Gasket Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hoosier Gasket Corp. averages 3.5 TCR (105% of the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hoosier Gasket Corp. TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Hoosier Gasket Corp. falls in its industry

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing d establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 15 Gasket, packing, and sealing d employers in Indiana.

Hoosier Gasket Corp. (129 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Hoosier Gasket Corp.
Hoosier Gasket Corp. (129 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Hoosier Gasket Corp. has more employees than the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 5.6 2.8 8 0 0
2018 4.6 2.3 5 1 0
2017 2.2 1.5 2 1 0
2016 6.7 6.0 7 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339991 · IN · Indianapolis

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR James Walker Mfg. Co. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Freudenberg-NOK General Partnership 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Rubber Company Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ILPEA Industries - Anderson 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harmon Steel Inc. 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Superior Forest Products LLC 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huhtamaki, Inc. 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Montpelier MFG (EF, AUTO) 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Marina Grand Resort 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Hardwoods of Ohio, Inc. - Vincent 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sahling Kenworth of York 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Triple A 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alta Equipment Company Livonia 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advantage Contractor Solutions 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schuman Cheese DBA Imperia Foods Inc. 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aludyne West Michigan LLC - Stevensville 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.