Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) · Michigan

Hope College

Holland, MI · ~168 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hope College runs at 264% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) workplace, earning a grade F.

Hope College: 7.9 TCR = 264% of Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS 3.0 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hope College safety composite

Hope College scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hope College: 3.7 → 9.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 13.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.38× in 2024

Hope College's TCR rose 5.3 from 3.7 in 2016 to 9.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Holland, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 264% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #188/210
  • PHOTO GL 7117 USS Chicago
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 72 inj
  • SIZE ~168 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GL 7117 USS Chicago (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Hope College in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hope College averages 7.9 TCR (264% of the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hope College TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=8.2 · 2018=9 · 2019=13.1 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=8.8 · 2022=3 · 2023=7.9 · 2024=9 · BLS 3.0

Where Hope College falls in its industry

6,952 Cafeteria food services contra establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #188 safest of 210 Cafeteria food services contra employers in Michigan.

Hope College (168 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hope College
Hope College (168 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Hope College has more employees than the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.0 3.0 9 0 0
2023 7.9 0.0 8 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 3 0 0
2021 8.8 3.3 8 0 0
2020 8.6 0.0 6 0 0
2019 13.1 3.1 17 0 0
2018 9.0 3.0 9 0 0
2017 8.2 7.2 8 0 0
2016 3.7 1.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · MI · Holland

6,952 Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 299 employers in Holland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GL 7117 USS Chicago 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 000019050 WAC 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer College Caterers, Inc. - Unit 026/Chowan University 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ELIM PARK BAPTIST HOME INC 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shoreline Fruit LLC 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sekisui Voltek, LLC, Coldwater 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Howmet Aerospace Whitehall Operations - HRC Complex 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lacroix Electronics 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR LG Energy Solutions - Holland 1,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haworth HQ 1,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haworth Office 1,075 FTE
CITY-NEAR PADNOS 912 FTE
NAT-TCR Rutan Poly Industries 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR IKEA #213 New Haven 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Spang Crest Manor 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Leisure Resort 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Costanzo's Bakery 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Twining, Inc. Laboratory 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bescast 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Design Homes, Inc 168 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.