Geotechnical testing laboratories or services · California

Twining, Inc. Laboratory

Long Beach, CA · ~168 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Twining, Inc. Laboratory runs at 368% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Geotechnical testing laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade F.

Twining, Inc. Laboratory: 1.8 TCR = 368% of Geotechnical testing laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Twining, Inc. Laboratory safety composite

Twining, Inc. Laboratory scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Twining, Inc. Laboratory: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.31× in 2024

Twining, Inc. Laboratory's TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541380 · Long Beach, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 1.8 · 368% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #20/35
  • PHOTO CTS Charlotte
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~168 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CTS Charlotte (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Twining, Inc. Laboratory in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Twining, Inc. Laboratory averages 1.8 TCR (368% of the Geotechnical testing laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Twining, Inc. Laboratory TCR series: 2017=0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 0.5

Where Twining, Inc. Laboratory falls in its industry

232 Geotechnical testing laborator establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 35 Geotechnical testing laborator employers in California.

Twining, Inc. Laboratory (168 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Twining, Inc. Laboratory
Twining, Inc. Laboratory (168 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0

Twining, Inc. Laboratory has more employees than the Geotechnical testing laboratories or ser median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2023 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2020 2.7 0.9 2 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541380 · CA · Long Beach

232 Geotechnical testing laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 614 employers in Long Beach, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CTS Charlotte 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westpak Inc 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primera - Cranbury 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mininger Farms 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bud of California Lettuce 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Sun Grower Services/Equipment Services & Lucero Farms - Los Banos 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCH 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorialcare Long Beach Medical Center 3,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR LBM00 LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MED CENTER 3,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Total Terminals International, LLC. 2,683 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 300 2,621 FTE
NAT-TCR Shape Corp - 1835 Industrial Dr. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Belcher Roofing Corporation 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Welsh Excavation Company, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Covington 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bescast 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Design Homes, Inc 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Costanzo's Bakery 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Office 168 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.