Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Hope Springs

Red Springs, NC · ~30 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hope Springs runs at 237% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Hope Springs: 9.0 TCR = 237% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hope Springs safety composite

Hope Springs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hope Springs held a steady TCR band

Hope Springs's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 45.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=5.0 · 2018=17.8 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=45.6 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Red Springs, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 237% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #266/356
  • PHOTO Des Plaines Courts a…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Des Plaines Courts and Garden (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Hope Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hope Springs averages 9.0 TCR (237% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hope Springs TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=5 · 2018=17.8 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=45.6 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Hope Springs falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #266 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Hope Springs (30 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hope Springs
Hope Springs (30 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Hope Springs has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 45.6 45.6 1 10 0
2019 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 17.8 0.0 4 0 0
2017 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Red Springs

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 7 employers in Red Springs, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Des Plaines Courts and Garden 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Gardens 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Elk Grove 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardena Retirement Center 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shugart Farm 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hays Hatchery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hight Family Farms LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE High Point Operations Center 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR 00900 - STORE # 900 RED SPRINGS 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR 900 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Springs Retirement Community, LLC 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR RED SPRINGS_1378967 22 FTE
NAT-TCR United Southwest Components 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Orchard Mgt 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Building Maintenance 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dakota Unlimited 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Parsons Residential Care 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bozrah Distribution 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Essential Vegetation Management Services 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE APL Engineered Materials, Inc. 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.