Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Virginia

Parsons Residential Care

Chesapeake, VA · ~30 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Parsons Residential Care runs at 288% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Parsons Residential Care: 10.9 TCR = 288% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Parsons Residential Care safety composite

Parsons Residential Care scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2022→2024

Parsons Residential Care injury rate improved

Parsons Residential Care's TCR fell 3.2 from 12.3 in 2022 to 9.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=12.3 · 2023=11.5 · 2024=9.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Chesapeake, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.9 · 288% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #141/199
  • PHOTO Renaissance - Appleton
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Renaissance - Appleton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Parsons Residential Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Parsons Residential Care averages 10.9 TCR (288% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Parsons Residential Care TCR series: 2022=12.3 · 2023=11.5 · 2024=9.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Parsons Residential Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #141 safest of 199 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Virginia.

Parsons Residential Care (30 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Parsons Residential Care
Parsons Residential Care (30 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Parsons Residential Care has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 11.5 0.0 3 0 0
2022 12.3 4.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Chesapeake

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 434 employers in Chesapeake, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Renaissance - Appleton 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Pekin 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSL-Broadway Mesa Village 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthology of Rochester Hills 10.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE NAES : Altavista Power Station 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northwest River Water Treatment Plant 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utilities - Wastewater Collections 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE First Class Contracting of Tidewater, LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ORF2 2,432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesapeake Regional Medical Center 2,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR QVC Chesapeake, Inc. 1,056 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crossways 931 FTE
NAT-TCR Cle-Ground Ops 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Terraces of Los Gatos 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Norton McMurray Manufacturing 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Washington Odd Fellows Home 10.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mount Pleasant House 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bozrah Distribution 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Somerset Court of Mocksville 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hope Springs 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.