Gown (e.g., doctors, nurses, hospital, beauticians) supply services · Washington

Hospital Central Services Association

Auburn, WA · ~304 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hospital Central Services Association runs at 289% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Gown (e.g., doctors, nurses, hospital, beauticians) supply services workplace, earning a grade F.

Hospital Central Services Association: 6.1 TCR = 289% of Gown (e.g., doctors, nurses, hospital, beauticians) supply services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hospital Central Services Association safety composite

Hospital Central Services Association scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2019→2021

Hospital Central Services Association injury rate improved

Hospital Central Services Association's TCR fell 1.7 from 6.9 in 2019 to 5.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.9 · 2021=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 812331 · Auburn, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.1 · 289% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO Angelica - Fresno
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~304 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Angelica - Fresno (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Hospital Central Services Association in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hospital Central Services Association averages 6.1 TCR (289% of the Gown (e.g., doctors, nurses, hospital, beauticians) supply services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hospital Central Services Association TCR series: 2019=6.9 · 2021=5.2 · BLS 2.1

Where Hospital Central Services Association falls in its industry

334 Gown (e.g., doctors, nurses, h establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Gown (e.g., doctors, nurses, h employers in Washington.

Hospital Central Services Association (304 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Hospital Central Services Association
Hospital Central Services Association (304 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Hospital Central Services Association has more employees than the Gown (e.g., doctors, nurses, hospital, b median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.2 4.2 12 4 0
2019 6.9 5.7 22 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

812331 · WA · Auburn

334 Gown (e.g., doctors, nurses, hospital, beauticians) supply services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 166 employers in Auburn, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Angelica - Fresno 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BJC Acute 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Twin Falls AmeriPride Services, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CT Plant 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE AUBURN WA 304 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1330 N Washington 304 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yakima Chief Hops 305 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia Crest Winery 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA001 4,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zones, LLC 1,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR Muckleshoot Casino 1,616 FTE
CITY-NEAR Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR Clear Lake Regional Medical Center 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Golden Valley Natural, LLC 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR L&M Corrugated Container Corp West 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sutter Medical Foundation (185-306) 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greenville (PC) 304 FTE
NAT-SIZE Swg So. Az. Div - Admin & Ops 0036-Fac29 304 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2253-H4637 304 FTE
NAT-SIZE EBAD-SY 304 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.