Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground · Arkansas

Hot Springs

Hot Springs, AR · ~124 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hot Springs runs at 200% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground workplace, earning a grade F.

Hot Springs: 5.6 TCR = 200% of Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hot Springs safety composite

Hot Springs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2023

Hot Springs injury rate improved

Hot Springs's TCR fell 4.6 from 4.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=13.1 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Hot Springs, AR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 5.6 · 200% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/14
  • PHOTO Pike Telecom and Ren…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 57 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pike Telecom and Renewables Tennessee Statewide Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Hot Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hot Springs averages 5.6 TCR (200% of the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hot Springs TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=13.1 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Hot Springs falls in its industry

1,605 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 14 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele employers in Arkansas.

Hot Springs (124 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hot Springs
Hot Springs (124 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Hot Springs has more employees than the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, el median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.3 2.6 2 0 0
2021 7.3 5.3 9 2 0
2020 2.7 2.2 5 0 0
2019 4.1 3.0 7 1 0
2018 7.9 5.7 25 0 0
2017 13.1 7.5 7 0 0
2016 4.6 4.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · AR · Hot Springs

1,605 Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 112 employers in Hot Springs, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pike Telecom and Renewables Tennessee Statewide Operations 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Utilicom, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 322 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Powell's Creek Solar Farm 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE El Dorado (formerly El Dorado Packaging) 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wheeling Machine Products - Pine Bluff 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manufacturing 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE FT SMITH AR 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR 03080001-030802 CHI ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS 1,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-03080001-030802 1,198 FTE
CITY-NEAR NATIONAL PARK MEDICAL CENTER 690 FTE
NAT-TCR ATI Aviation Services, LLC. 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Keystone Iron and Metal Co., Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Potential Electric, LLC 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Southview - Ramsey Hill Senior Living 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 044-ROE Salem 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hendley Communications, Inc. 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Basic Construction Co. 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE B.R Funsten & Co 02 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.