Hospices, inpatient care · Arkansas

Hot Springs Inpatient Center

Hot Springs, AR · ~29 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hot Springs Inpatient Center runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hospices, inpatient care workplace, earning a grade B.

Hot Springs Inpatient Center: 4.0 TCR = 62% of Hospices, inpatient care BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hot Springs Inpatient Center safety composite

Hot Springs Inpatient Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−24.4

2016→2022

Hot Springs Inpatient Center injury rate improved

Hot Springs Inpatient Center's TCR fell 24.4 from 24.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 24.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=24.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Hot Springs, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #54/198
  • PHOTO HP Healthcare
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HP Healthcare (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Hot Springs Inpatient Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hot Springs Inpatient Center averages 4.0 TCR (62% of the Hospices, inpatient care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hot Springs Inpatient Center TCR series: 2016=24.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Hot Springs Inpatient Center falls in its industry

15,252 Hospices, inpatient care establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 198 Hospices, inpatient care employers in Arkansas.

Hot Springs Inpatient Center (29 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hot Springs Inpatient Center
Hot Springs Inpatient Center (29 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Hot Springs Inpatient Center has fewer employees than the Hospices, inpatient care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 24.4 18.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · AR · Hot Springs

15,252 Hospices, inpatient care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 112 employers in Hot Springs, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HP Healthcare 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life Care Center of Collegedale 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spanish Trails Rehabilitation Suites 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mayfair Village Retirement 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Entergy Russellville 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Harding Construction 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACE Glass Construction - NW 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electrical 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR 03080001-030802 CHI ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS 1,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-03080001-030802 1,198 FTE
CITY-NEAR NATIONAL PARK MEDICAL CENTER 690 FTE
NAT-TCR Davannis Inc. Coon Rapids 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tnebr - Memphis 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cain Bay Elementary School 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Vacation Villages at Parkway 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Newark Wire Cloth company 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alumisource Corporation- Richmond 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-Ea-Grk-Kileen - Fort Hood-Grk-Trml 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-EA-GSO-GREENSBORO-GSO-TRML 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.