Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing · Texas

Houston South

Houston, TX · ~188 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Houston South runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Houston South: 3.5 TCR = 108% of Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Houston South safety composite

Houston South scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2024

Houston South injury rate improved

Houston South's TCR fell 3.8 from 5.7 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.7 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 108% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #9/22
  • PHOTO Rieke Corporation- A…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 79 inj
  • SIZE ~188 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rieke Corporation- Auburn (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Houston South in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Houston South averages 3.5 TCR (108% of the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Houston South TCR series: 2016=5.7 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Houston South falls in its industry

477 Metal stampings (except automo establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 22 Metal stampings (except automo employers in Texas.

Houston South (188 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Houston South
Houston South (188 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Houston South has more employees than the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.7 7 1 0
2023 1.6 1.3 6 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 7 0 0
2021 3.5 2.7 9 0 0
2020 3.5 3.5 7 0 0
2019 4.7 3.1 9 0 0
2018 5.3 3.7 10 0 0
2017 4.1 3.7 10 0 0
2016 5.7 4.4 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · TX · Houston

477 Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rieke Corporation- Auburn 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR R-5 Metal Fabricators, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kapco Inc. - Osceola 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Collier Metal Specialties LTD 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kodiak Trenching & Boring, LLC 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quanta Infrastructure Solutions Group, LLC 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Elm 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE GILCO CONTRACTING, INC. 188 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Pompano Beach RPC 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Precise Tool & Manufacturing Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Nashville Commercial - 25 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dillard Lumber 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation FL-Crestview-Eglin AFB (5172) 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owens & Minor Carol Stream 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE McGuire Memorial 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fisher Contracting Co. 188 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.