Pipeline terminal facilities, independently operated · Texas

Howard Midstream Energy Partners

San Antonio, TX · ~200 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Howard Midstream Energy Partners runs at 9% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pipeline terminal facilities, independently operated workplace, earning a grade A.

Howard Midstream Energy Partners: 0.4 TCR = 9% of Pipeline terminal facilities, independently operated BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Howard Midstream Energy Partners safety composite

Howard Midstream Energy Partners scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2023

Howard Midstream Energy Partners injury rate improved

Howard Midstream Energy Partners's TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488999 · San Antonio, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 9% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Calcasieu Pass LNG
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Calcasieu Pass LNG (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Howard Midstream Energy Partners in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Howard Midstream Energy Partners averages 0.4 TCR (9% of the Pipeline terminal facilities, independently operated BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Howard Midstream Energy Partners TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Howard Midstream Energy Partners falls in its industry

37 Pipeline terminal facilities, establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Pipeline terminal facilities, employers in Texas.

Howard Midstream Energy Partners (200 employees, TCR 0.4) among 25 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 57 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 26 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Howard Midstream Energy Partners
Howard Midstream Energy Partners (200 employees, TCR 0.4) among 25 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 57 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Howard Midstream Energy Partners has more employees than the Pipeline terminal facilities, independen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.3 1.3 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488999 · TX · San Antonio

37 Pipeline terminal facilities, independently operated employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Calcasieu Pass LNG 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials- HQ 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Historic Tours of America, Inc. - Corporate 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Rapids Railcar Repair 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1400 W LOOP 340, WACO CALL CTR (SS) 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE SI Environmental 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE KIK Underground, LLC 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE WeldFit Services 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Unit #2327 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Greater LA 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ferguson Electric 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR BAE Systems Electronic Systems CIA02 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Sewickley 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100662 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fiesta Canning Company 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE MHRC/PHF 200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.